Fundamentals of Soil Sciences and Recent Advances | Doi : 10.37446/edibook022024/11-28

PAID ACCESS | Published on : 30-Nov-2024

Classification of Soil

  • K. Radhika
  • Associate Professor, SNS College of Technology, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Coimbatore – 641 035, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • M. Karthikeyan
  • Associate Professor, Department of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore – 641003. Tamil Nadu, India.

Abstract

Various schemes for categorizing soils and soil materials have been developed, each serving distinct purposes. Among these, morpho-genetic systems with an agricultural implication, such as World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB) and Soil Taxonomy, have become widely accepted globally. This chapter delivers an outline of the fundamental principles of soil classification, focusing on Soil Taxonomy, WRB, and select national soil classifications (Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, and Canada). The WRB classification system was designed not to replace national taxonomies but to facilitate soil correlation internationally, enabling specialists from different countries to communicate more effectively. This chapter explores how these systems contribute to understanding soil diversity and supporting sustainable land management practices worldwide.

Keywords

Soil classification, World reference base for soil resources, Soil taxonomy, Morpho-genetic systems, Pedogenic processes, Soil properties

References

  • Buol, S., Certini, G., & Scalenghe, R. (2006). Naming soils and soil horizons. In Soils. Basic Concepts and Future Challenges (pp. 265-275). Cambridge University Press.

    Canada Soil Survey Committee, Subcommittee on Soil Classification. The Canadian system of soil classification. Canada Department of Agriculture Publication No. 1646. Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1978.

    Costa de Lemos R. ‘The main tropical soils of Brasil’, Approaches to Soil Classification, FAO World Soil Resources Report no 32, UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 1968, 95-106.

    EMBRAPA. Sistema Brasileiro de Clasificação de solos, EmbrapaProdução de Informação, Brasília-Embrapa Solos, Rio de Janeiro, 1999, 412.

    Glinka, Konstantin Dmitrievich. Dokuchaiev's ideas in the development of pedology and cognate sciences. No. 1. The Academy, 1927.

    Hewitt, A. E. (1992). Soil classification in New Zealand-Legacy and lessons. Soil Research30(6), 843-854.

    Hewitt AE. New Zealand Soil Classification, 2nd edition, Maanaki Whenua-Landcare New Zealand Ltd, Dunedin, Landcare Research Science Series no 1, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand, 1998, 122.

    Hewitt, A. E. (1984). The NZ Soil Classification revision: Taylor's patch reworked. New Zealand Soil News32, 220-229.

    Hubble GD, Isbell RF, Northcote KH. Features of Australian Soils. In ‘Soils: An Australian viewpoint’. (Division of Soils, CSIRO), (CSIRO: Melbourne/Academic Press: London), 1983, 17-47.

    Isbell, R. F., McDonald, W. S., & Ashton, L. J. (1997). Concepts and rationale of the Australian Soil Classification (pp. 152-pp).

    Harms, B. (2023). To B and not B2–the Australian soil horizon system: history and review. Soil research61(5), 421-455.

    Isbell RF. Australian Soil Classification, revised edition, CSIRO Land & Water, Canberra, 2002, 144.

    IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources, 2nd edition, World Soil Resources Reports no 103, UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2006, 128.

    IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources, 3rd edition, World Soil Resources Reports no 106, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, Rome, 2014, 192.

    Jacomine, P. K. T., & Camargo, M. N. (1996). Classificação pedológica nacional em vigor. Solos nos grandes domínios morfoclimáticos do Brasil eo desenvolvimento sustentado. SBCS-UFV, Viçosa, 675-689.

    Krasilnikov, P., Martí, J. J. I., Arnold, R., & Shoba, S. (2009). A handbook of soil terminology, correlation and classification. Routledge.

    McDonald, R. C., Isbell, R. F., Speight, J. G., Walker, J., & Hopkins, M. S. (1998). Australian soil and land survey: field handbook (No. Ed. 2, pp. xv+-190).

    McDonald, R. C., Isbell, R. F., Speight, J. G., Walker, J., & Hopkins, M. S. (1998). Australian soil and land survey: field handbook (No. Ed. 2, pp. xv+-190).

    Raychaudhuri SP. Evolution of classification of soils of India. Indian Agric. 1975;19(1):163-173.

    Shishov, L. L., Tonkonogov, V. D., Lebedeva, I. I., & Gerasimova, M. I. (2004). Klassifikatsiya i diagnostika pochv Rossii [Classification and diagnostics of soils in Russia]. Smolensk, Oykumena Publ.

    Soil Classification Working Group. The Canadian System of Soil Classification (3rd edition) Agric. and Agri-Food Can. Publ. 1646 (Revised), 1998, 187. ISBN 0-660-17404-9.

    Soil Survey Staff, Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 12thedn. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington DC, 2014.

    Soil Survey Staff, Soil Classification, a Comprehensive System-7th Approximation. USDA. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1960.

    Soil Survey Staff, Soil Taxonomy. USDA Handb. 436. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1975.

    Soil Survey Staff. Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys, 2nd edition, USDA-NRCS, Lincoln, NB, United States Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 1999, 696.

    Velayutham, M. (2000). Available soil information and the need for a systematic classification of soils of India. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science48(4), 683-689.